CBR and MBR techniques: review for an application in the emergencies domain

The purpose of this document is to provide an in-depth analysis of current reasoning engine practice and the integration strategies of Case Based Reasoning and Model Based Reasoning that will be used in the design and development of the RIMSAT system. RIMSAT (Remote Intelligent Management Support and Training) is a European Commission funded project designed to: a.. Provide an innovative, 'intelligent', knowledge based solution aimed at improving the quality of critical decisions b.. Enhance the competencies and responsiveness of individuals and organisations involved in highly complex, safety critical incidents - irrespective of their location. In other words, RIMSAT aims to design and implement a decision support system that using Case Base Reasoning as well as Model Base Reasoning technology is applied in the management of emergency situations. This document is part of a deliverable for RIMSAT project, and although it has been done in close contact with the requirements of the project, it provides an overview wide enough for providing a state of the art in integration strategies between CBR and MBR technologies.Postprint (published version

New mini-bucket partitioning heuristics for bounding the probability of evidence

Mini-Bucket Elimination (MBE) is a well-known approximation algorithm deriving lower and upper bounds on quantities of interest over graphical models. It relies on a procedure that partitions a set of functions, called bucket, into smaller subsets, called mini-buckets. The method has been used with a single partitioning heuristic throughout, so the impact of the partitioning algorithm on the quality of the generated bound has never been investigated. This paper addresses this issue by presenting a framework within which partitioning strategies can be described, analyzed and compared. We derive a new class of partitioning heuristics from first-principles geared for likelihood queries, demonstrate their impact on a number of benchmarks for probabilistic reasoning and show that the results are competitive (often superior) to state-ofthe-art bounding schemes.Postprint (published version

Limited discrepancy AND/OR search and its application to optimization tasks in graphical models

Many combinatorial problems are solved with a Depth-First search (DFS) guided by a heuristic and it is well-known that this method is very fragile with respect to heuristic mistakes. One standard way to make DFS more robust is to search by increasing number of discrepancies. This approach has been found useful in several domains where the search structure is a height-bounded OR tree. In this paper we investigate the generalization of discrepancy-based search to AND/OR search trees and propose an extension of the Limited Discrepancy Search (LDS) algorithm. We demonstrate the relevance of our proposal in the context of Graphical Models. In these problems, which can be solved with either a standard OR search tree or an AND/OR tree, we show the superiority of our approach. For a fixed number of discrepancies, the search space visited by the AND/OR algorithm strictly contains the search space visited by standard LDS, and many more nodes can be visited due to the multiplicative effect of the AND/OR decomposition. Besides, if the AND/OR tree achieves a significant size reduction with respect to the standard OR tree, the cost of each iteration of the AND/OR algorithm is asymptotically lower than in standard LDS. We report experiments on the minsum problem on different domains and show that the AND/OR version of LDS usually obtains better solutions given the same CPU time.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Proof complexity for the maximum satisfiability problem and its use in SAT refutations

MaxSAT, the optimization version of the well-known SAT problem, has attracted a lot of research interest in the past decade. Motivated by the many important applications and inspired by the success of modern SAT solvers, researchers have developed many MaxSAT solvers. Since most research is algorithmic, its significance is mostly evaluated empirically. In this paper, we want to address MaxSAT from the more formal point of view of proof complexity. With that aim, we start providing basic definitions and proving some basic results. Then we analyse the effect of adding split and virtual, two original inference rules, to MaxSAT resolution. We show that each addition makes the resulting proof system stronger, even when virtual is restricted to empty clauses (0-virtual). We also analyse the power of our proof systems in the particular case of SAT refutations. We show that our strongest system, ResSV, is equivalent to circular and dual rail with split. We also analyse empirically some known gadget-based reformulations. Our results seem to indicate that the advantage of these three seemingly different systems over general resolution comes mainly from their ability of augmenting the original formula with hypothetical inconsistencies, as captured in a very simple way by the virtual rule.Under project RTI2018-094403-B-C33 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER ”Una manera de hacer Europa"Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Choosing the root of the tree decomposition when solving WCSPs: preliminary results

In this paper we analyze the effect of selecting the root in a tree decomposition when using decomposition-based backtracking algorithms. We focus on optimization tasks for Graphical Models using the BTD algorithm. We show that the choice of the root typically has a dramatic effect in the solving performance. Then we investigate different simple measures to predict near optimal roots. Our study shows that correlations are often low, so the automatic selection of a near optimal root will require more sophisticated techniques.Projects RTI2018-094403-B-C33, funded by: FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Agencia Estatal de Investigación,SpainPeer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Introducció de tècniques d’aprenentatge col•laboratiu i semi-presencial en l’àmbit de bases de dades

Podem classificar les àrees d’actuació del projecte en tres grups diferents: 1) S'han reestructurat els temaris de les assignatures de tota la branca de “bases de dades” de la FIB. 2) S’han introduït activitats participatives a les assignatures amb menys estudiants. 3) S'ha desenvolupat un sistema que permet la definició de qüestionaris per a la pràctica i avaluació del llenguatge d'accés a bases de dades SQL. Aquest sistema permet als professors la creació d'exercicis i l'establiment des del seu ordinador personal d'un mecanisme de correcció. Aquests exercicis o qüestions queden emmagatzemats a una base de dades comuna per a tots els professors. Després mitjançant un mòdul d'activitat que es pot instal·lar a Moodle v1.8 (Atenea), es poden definir qüestionaris que continguin aquests exercicis i posar-los a disposició dels estudiants. Aquests, podran veure els enunciats, introduir-hi les seves respostes i en qüestió de segons rebre la correcció del que han fet

New mini-bucket partitioning heuristics for bounding the probability of evidence

Mini-Bucket Elimination (MBE) is a well-known approximation algorithm deriving lower and upper bounds on quantities of interest over graphical models. It relies on a procedure that partitions a set of functions, called bucket, into smaller subsets, called mini-buckets. The method has been used with a single partitioning heuristic throughout, so the impact of the partitioning algorithm on the quality of the generated bound has never been investigated. This paper addresses this issue by presenting a framework within which partitioning strategies can be described, analyzed and compared. We derive a new class of partitioning heuristics from first-principles geared for likelihood queries, demonstrate their impact on a number of benchmarks for probabilistic reasoning and show that the results are competitive (often superior) to state-ofthe-art bounding schemes

New mini-bucket partitioning heuristics for bounding the probability of evidence

Mini-Bucket Elimination (MBE) is a well-known approximation algorithm deriving lower and upper bounds on quantities of interest over graphical models. It relies on a procedure that partitions a set of functions, called bucket, into smaller subsets, called mini-buckets. The method has been used with a single partitioning heuristic throughout, so the impact of the partitioning algorithm on the quality of the generated bound has never been investigated. This paper addresses this issue by presenting a framework within which partitioning strategies can be described, analyzed and compared. We derive a new class of partitioning heuristics from first-principles geared for likelihood queries, demonstrate their impact on a number of benchmarks for probabilistic reasoning and show that the results are competitive (often superior) to state-ofthe-art bounding schemes

Augmenting the power of (partial) MaxSat resolution with extension

The refutation power of SAT and MaxSAT resolution is challenged by problems like the soft and hard Pigeon Hole Problem PHP for which short refutations do not exist. In this paper we augment the MaxSAT resolution proof system with an extension rule. The new proof system MaxResE is sound and complete, and more powerful than plain MaxSAT resolution, since it can refute the soft and hard PHP in polynomial time. We show that MaxResE refutations actually subtract lower bounds from the objective function encoded by the formulas. The resulting formula is the residual after the lower bound extraction. We experimentally show that the residual of the soft PHP (once its necessary cost of 1 has been efficiently subtracted with MaxResE) is a concise, easy to solve, satisfiable problem.This work was funded partially by the Spanish MINECO and MICINN projects TIN2015-69175-C4-3-R and RTI2018-094403-B-C33.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

CBR and MBR techniques: review for an application in the emergencies domain

The purpose of this document is to provide an in-depth analysis of current reasoning engine practice and the integration strategies of Case Based Reasoning and Model Based Reasoning that will be used in the design and development of the RIMSAT system. RIMSAT (Remote Intelligent Management Support and Training) is a European Commission funded project designed to: a.. Provide an innovative, 'intelligent', knowledge based solution aimed at improving the quality of critical decisions b.. Enhance the competencies and responsiveness of individuals and organisations involved in highly complex, safety critical incidents - irrespective of their location. In other words, RIMSAT aims to design and implement a decision support system that using Case Base Reasoning as well as Model Base Reasoning technology is applied in the management of emergency situations. This document is part of a deliverable for RIMSAT project, and although it has been done in close contact with the requirements of the project, it provides an overview wide enough for providing a state of the art in integration strategies between CBR and MBR technologies